MoviesNewsTalk
Saturday Night Live, a staple of American television, has for decades curated a diverse range of segments but at key dates such as Christmas, often finds itself leaning far harder onto big name power to highlight their particular seasonal formatted broadcasts which then, often calls for viewers to question if their content truly works because of unique well crafted sketches or if they simply benefit entirely from known actors. Therefore, our main discussion point here will be on diving into SNL’s often repeated formula of Christmas episode and question how those specific production choices do elevate their programs value or limit those from greater potential due to various structural problems.
The main key appeal regarding those specifically formatted Christmas episodes from SNL always involves big name Hollywood personalities taking front and center-stage with many of these choices providing good or very well known figures but in the modern-day such 'big draws’ don’t guarantee ratings will match a show's initial expectations as most audiences tend to carefully evaluate what they consume, specifically for streaming content, which forces viewers to really reassess if their format truly needs to rely on ‘star power’. The common and main practice is always placing those recognizable figures not simply to introduce or host shows but always using them as the key or main element inside main segments to add star value which often helps in making those less-then impressive sketches to become easier to enjoy and consume thanks to sheer performance quality.
Whilst this often works and provides for some genuinely interesting concepts when a good host also can do acting, it then also can serve as a crutch that prevents show writers to go fully in when approaching new skits that rely mostly on actors, because there will be always that ‘expectation of known’ quantity versus unknown which makes a writing process seem limiting as writers could take those smaller characters or unknown member groups to truly expand beyond comfort-zones. This may also lead into missed potential of more independent or fresh skits or themes ( particularly those without any outside connection with previously made content).
There's no doubting in that such approach often creates that feeling of a unique 'event' and often allows some classic SNL moments to happen as many core and known TV actors find some hidden talents inside this program which may translate into very well written skits due to a character’s genuine passion for something beyond an easy or comfortable spot, but more often the star system ends up becoming simply a very easy ‘card’ to simply take advantage on by producers as their reliance over outside guests starts to take greater relevance over long term format; that could negatively impact many segments or long running characters.
The true success regarding Christmas styled episodes at SNL isn’t just through choosing stars to highlight but through showcasing quality material, and that can only happen through a well written plan to fully use them. As great as these people are they still often act in a specific role or type set of their known talents which in several examples will completely break immersion since most skits on this show seem less 'realistic character portraits' ( or grounded roles for outside shows and media formats) but instead designed to be overly goofy and comedic but those same qualities seem entirely off in any character they're not used to, creating almost an immediate disconnect .
An example could be a highly acclaimed serious actor trying to deliver silly over the top one liner while wearing over complicated costumes as they can't quite match that format which often reduces their capabilities since not all good serious roles or serious minded performers can be good at comedic acts, as acting relies more often in ‘embodying an idea’ not merely saying a dialogue or reading the script making that star casting not an immediate guaranteed success without greater efforts to create high value sketch material; its less about names, it's more about good structure and that's not entirely dependent on known figures at its best but what a performer can achieve.
However when a great performance does occur ( with unique timing as well as comedic approach that does require specific performance capabilities that not everyone possesses) that results in truly outstanding sketch comedy and many times they’ve shown very successful results when all creative talents can make some 'hidden charm' within a series that goes above and beyond and transcends a mere sketch, it simply demands greater work and careful structuring. And in recent times those moments have come few and far in between, often raising the big question over ‘format reliability’ with the show needing to change in some new and positive manners.
The main criticism over SNL often revolves on when they seem to be heavily leaning on a ‘star system' where outside names that seem highly marketable are given priority over existing program talent members; by shifting more screen time over people that most viewers do recognize rather than exploring how main cast or long standing characters can provide equally if not even better options while exploring brand new types of jokes through previously established properties ( if those are well developed with long term commitment of the series writers) because when compared those often come out lacking in scope due to lack of time for proper story setups, that does limit an overall value when looking at that single episode’s format and how all can (or can not ) integrate with other show aspects.
With most big named stars those might act, but may not possess a 'specific character quality' as they only know very specific roles that limit options whereas a show has long running supporting members that could expand past their limitations into other options ( without breaking prior characters or expectations). The consistent format often forgets this factor when putting the spotlights into a very familiar actor but lacking an appropriate writing plan and approach to support that act.
All things said regarding this type of show approach, there’s many positives for the idea for these holiday season specials but with greater effort this production format could achieve more by integrating their original ongoing TV team, with well known but still relevant guest stars ( and not simply those with marketable value for advertising reasons ). In short more care over each different acting choice can lead to much greater success in their goals and, most importantly for their viewership too because what’s usually presented ( by the show ) always seems ‘too comfortable’ or completely unengaging ( because most audience members often see through forced comedy when the writing aspect comes across less organic to their viewers; there's too much emphasis on star power as something that is valuable and should carry a show entirely) making for a disappointing viewer session if there is no core 'heart' to those concepts.
SNL’s Christmas episodes offer a tradition but not without caveats and the star studded format should be considered to have the potential for unique ideas by finding that balance through a shared method ( the TV casts alongside those outside names) . Without such shifts for structure the program simply relies heavily on previously made ‘easy wins’ by recycling proven methods without actually ever attempting brand new approaches that fully use potential on talent regardless of recognition value; by simply doing that, viewers may also enjoy greater content, as a more well refined sketch structure might easily translate into larger viewership.
For the future it's very clear what SNL could do but isn't. It needs to push more from within by taking higher risks rather than just aiming for known formulas; that approach is good but doesn't hold up on modern TV consumption when audience is more inclined towards independent media with unique and new takes that simply recycle 'safe approaches'; the best form of ‘star power’ doesn’t simply mean a familiar name as it could also provide an entirely new format that can bring unique forms of viewer engagement beyond the simple use of familiar names and by carefully reexamining core production details all viewers (and long term fans) may have an even better product to follow along with as a form of a new tv-based unique and modern sketch comedy.