Movies News Talk
2024 US Election: How Abortion Rights Are Shaping Women's Votes
The 2024 US presidential election is the first since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade, ending the constitutional right to abortion. This has created a massive gender divide in this election. Polls show Kamala Harris leading among women voters, while Donald Trump enjoys similar support amongst men. This is not really surprising, and many people have discussed the implications behind such deeply split voting results.
We're exploring how women voters are weighing gender and Abortion rights when deciding their votes. This explores that highly sensitive yet vitally important context that helps define these critical choices; as these events are unfolding. Those implications become especially important when viewing the potential impacts of having either candidate actually win this Election!
Let's dive into the stories of several women Voters across various states, showcasing those different viewpoints and experiences from voters which were personally surveyed. Their voices and opinions reveal that simple, straightforward categorization fails miserably at capturing their intensely personal beliefs.
Michelle, a 38-year-old quality engineer and registered Republican, plans to vote for Kamala Harris. She says she's concerned about women's health care and reproductive rights; and that "I work in the medical sector and I was very personally affected by the overturn of Roe v Wade because I wasn't able to get access to a lot of the drugs I needed. Nobody was sure of what the legality was... even though they're used for other things." Her view of the Republican Party's position on smaller government does not square with what she finds to be contradictory stances on regulating women's reproductive decisions.
This Texas nurse, a Trump supporter in 2020, plans to vote for him again. She stated "I'm not voting personality. I'm voting policy. I don't have to marry the man. I don't have to deal with him. I have to deal with his policies." She believes Harris's stance on abortion lacks a clear gestational limit, which concerns her given her professional background.
This Illinois Democrat voted for Joe Biden in 2020 and will vote for Harris this year. She expressed deep concerns regarding reproductive rights in some parts of the United States. She stated that "Trump's attempts to communicate that he understands why [reproductive rights] is an important issue to women has fallen woefully short" and felt Harris, as a woman and a woman of color, inherently understands these issues, although expressing hopes for a stronger and more expansive plan going forward.
This Georgia voter supported Trump in 2020 but is undecided this year and considers a write-in candidate; This displays how difficult that choice for some is; even deeply impacted by how intense both candidates were in prior years; not influenced enough to shift any votes and maintain previous positions.
Angela, an Iowa graduate student and Democrat, supported Biden in 2020 and will vote for Harris this year, although expresses considerable disappointment with Harris’s campaign strategy around specific issues, even issues which she stated were immensely important.
A retired Texas woman, and Trump supporter, criticizes Harris’s competency. She feels that Trump's approach of delegating abortion decisions to states is “sensible” and that this approach “she doesn't have much to run on so that's her big selling point with women. She doesn't have much substance to her, in other words, so she just hammers on and on about the abortion issue.” despite personally being "pro-choice, actually, within reason."
An independent from Florida states that reproductive rights were tremendously important; and states that the Florida amendment on reproductive rights was what solidified her support for Harris because "[What's] to say it's not going to spread elsewhere? It starts with women, usually, but it goes on and on." highlighting that these types of protections would become much more wide-ranging; especially if reproductive rights were further expanded.
A Georgia independent voter, describes herself as a left-leaning moderate. However; anti-abortion stance plus her Catholic beliefs creates deep personal issues that prevent voting for either candidate; this situation becomes further emphasized upon by how she states “I take the injunction to welcome the stranger and to feed and clothe very seriously” showcasing those specific details and values held tightly by many of these Voters which might otherwise prevent votes to occur at all.
A retired Texas voter, and Biden supporter in 2020 voted early for Harris this year because "We actually can't go back. It's very frightening to me. I had more rights than my granddaughter is going to have in her future and that's not right." Expressing immense fear for the implications of electing Trump, and deep disappointment that "Trump is a felon out on bail. I don't understand the Republicans. They used to be the law and order [party], supposedly, and it's now this."
These stories display that there are varied beliefs surrounding the abortion issue! The viewpoints range drastically from staunch pro-choice to pro-life, and some expressed concern around specific abortion laws; particularly later-term abortions. However, the overarching element in these situations shows that this critical social issue and those highly emotionally charged arguments involved surrounding this matter remain at the very heart of that crucial discussion which helps decide who this year's voter will cast their vote to. These women's perspectives and voting choices emphasize just why the Roe v Wade reversal remains this dominant factor.
That deeply personal choice and the emotional weight and those strongly-held beliefs emphasize why such a personal issue matters tremendously and directly impacts the voting choices made in this 2024 election and many ongoing discussions continue to occur in its aftermath, with continued analysis of this matter remaining essential. And it really highlights just how deep and personal those choices might truly be.