Blake Lively's recent lawsuit against Justin Baldoni has created an incredible storm of conversation, not just within Hollywood circles or the wider entertainment industry but also far beyond. This isn't solely an isolated legal event; the detailed information unveiled reveals power struggles, ethical issues within large media corporations as well as all the negative underpinnings behind a public image. Therefore what we seek to present today isn't just to explore the specific allegations or provide commentary over media publications but, it instead seeks to use this very explicit example to uncover important core elements that also highlight long running issues inside Hollywood productions from production design and ethical decision making during work hours or even ethical behavior within those organizations themselves. And to appreciate it completely one must look behind just the ' surface' to explore what all this really implies.
The Anatomy of a Lawsuit: Unpacking Lively's Claims Against Baldoni
Blake Lively’s lawsuit against Justin Baldoni and his production company, Wayfarer Studios, brings forth serious allegations that range from sexual harassment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligence in a work setting but its also far beyond that by carefully exposing many other aspects. The inclusion of the "Scenario Planning Document" reveals much about the mechanisms in place by media industries to control negative publicity especially through what’s called "reputation management " which often involves more manipulation of information. That document in particular reveals a willingness by the studio team to manipulate information as an element in deflecting what was said by Lively by using very cheap tactics such as: misrepresenting feminist viewpoints, by using celebrity associates (such as Swift) by pushing false social media narratives on what should be private workplace issues that only adds far more fuel and controversy while attempting to silence and delegitimize Lively and also, all women who bring forth the exact same workplace mistreatments in other scenarios .
Another concerning point within legal documents is that private text messages shown during the evidence that showcase the clear intent to "bury" Lively with very active steps undertaken via a pre prepared social media assault with use of bots, public opinion campaigns through use of influencers are all done before any lawsuit actually happened. Which often reveals those types of organizations are willing to utilize a pre set formula from start to finish, demonstrating some of core values from higher management are always to silence a single voice rather than address a root issue. This also highlights the vulnerability of celebrities that seemingly carry incredible power through fame yet, in reality have their voices easily crushed by complex and well oiled PR management industries with many levels of intricate power structure that aim solely to serve media owners and its partners .
The Broader Context: Power Dynamics in Hollywood
This case isn't simply an isolated instance but a window into far more critical underlying concerns, because the way it's presented exposes how quickly, powerful industry members are willing to not address internal core problems but will instead make active choices to shut up or destroy anyone speaking over those systemic issues. Lively’s lawsuit highlights all very carefully designed steps, or strategies taken, in place to not seek an internal change, or compromise that often shows how most companies in positions of high influence and control will opt for power struggles rather than dialogue ( or even an impartial investigation). Baldoni's reaction, as documented by all legal information, indicates an initial understanding from this problem before succumbing to pressure of all PR groups which leads one to believe most companies or producers are aware those actions taken do indeed represent terrible practices (even if for business reasons they choose to not intervene actively) and this element by itself can provide further conversations about how deeply those structural flaws tend to reside within media industries .
The inclusion of such planning document within that lawsuit does show that all these actions are far more common rather than the exception; which has an even greater ethical responsibility over similar type of companies and their actions because this exposes even further a very broken culture as these problems tend to go deeper than just single case scenario situations and there’s a tendency from top to push responsibility on the employee while removing all fault on organization’s ethics as if there was no connection between its top down management or corporate culture from events.
Beyond the Allegations: What Does This Mean for the Industry?
The long-term implications regarding all this goes far beyond that one lawsuit between two celebrity public figures but its long lasting effect will surely open up a new conversations concerning production and ethical practices that will create new understanding for those who are less connected to production values. Many smaller and often independent teams rely heavily on a similar ‘follow suit' to that behavior from higher authority power players but this case also shows that even with power comes an expectation about moral behavior and ethical choices from leadership so this single specific legal issue, can force a change over many long standing practices on lower management positions by creating new boundaries and awareness about those workplace related dangers often present behind those corporate layers that many never get to see with open transparent approaches, which makes more ethical or better organized teams that do rely on different types of approach to become more valued instead of the long-standing status quo of covering their own legal mistakes over workers rights issues, with these types of highly publicized legal and social media disasters. This can, without question create new perspectives with time that ultimately benefit everyone.
It's worth noting the action from WME agency by dropping Baldoni ( while it is also a company that represents Lively too), could set an important step and act as an example that ethical responsibility from higher power also holds large and important consequences that do carry value inside big Hollywood players in positions that most regular folks can't always appreciate as any new movement forward requires also to showcase new positive examples and that often starts from an upper scale approach; if they don’t move everyone under tends to never truly shift at any levels. These shifts tend to create a great value for transparency as there’s clear damage to each individual, organization or member by attempting to hide things when, eventually truths come out in the long-run.
Conclusion: The Need for Change and Accountability
Blake Lively's lawsuit will leave behind important long running ripple effects inside Hollywood by putting many older outdated unethical values under intense scrutiny; which hopefully will set a new example not simply regarding public relations control strategies but in changing the entire industry that, in its quest for high value profits and low production costs had, over time also begun accepting less than morally correct methods and behavior for decades as an ‘ accepted norm'
This ongoing story will serve as a case study on several matters as the lawsuit explores deeply issues with a very complex system for power dynamics at the very core as well as ongoing and mostly unacknowledged social, personal, or even ethical problems as an entirely new generation of media production and viewing seeks for greater understanding about issues. If one lesson must be learned from it, is that the ‘all power position’ has long run out its welcome and more people do seem interested in having transparency, honesty and personal responsibility as much greater qualities in higher organizational positions and that is where real change and value may begin.
input: You are a highly skilled and insightful entertainment journalist specializing in deep dives into film, television, and particularly comic book adaptations. Your writing style is reminiscent of Molly Freeman from Screen Rant: analytical, well-researched, and thoughtful, exploring both the surface-level aspects and the deeper thematic implications of the subject matter. You’re not afraid to challenge popular opinion and offer unique interpretations. You're adept at weaving together plot analysis, character studies, and broader cultural contexts. Your Task: Using the provided topic and research content, generate a comprehensive article that embodies the following characteristics: In-Depth Analysis: Don't just summarize the plot; dissect it. Identify key themes, motifs, and symbolic elements. Analyze the narrative structure, character arcs, and the use of visual storytelling. Thoughtful Critique: Offer a balanced perspective, pointing out both the strengths and weaknesses of the subject matter. Avoid being overly positive or negative; instead, provide nuanced commentary. Well-Researched: Incorporate the provided research content seamlessly into your analysis. Use specific examples, references, and facts to support your claims. Engaging Tone: Maintain an intelligent and engaging tone. Aim to inform and entertain the reader, making complex ideas accessible and understandable. Molly Freeman Style: Emulate her clear and concise writing, her focus on thematic depth, and her ability to connect the subject matter to broader cultural trends. Consider the Big Picture: When relevant, explore the impact and implications of the work in the broader context of its genre or industry. Consider the themes it brings up, the questions it asks, and the conversations it might spark. Input: Topic: 1923 filming location map, 1923 season 1 filming locations Research Content: Filming for 1923 happened in a variety of locations. While the show is set primarily in Montana, it was not always where production occurred. Let's dive into where exactly the filming for 1923 was done. Montana The areas around Butte, Montana, played a key role in bringing 1923 to life. In 1923, the Montana landscape serves as an important aspect of the show. The beauty of the natural landscapes paired with the struggle for land and wealth are both important to its themes. These parts of Montana helped bring the world of the show to life. According to an interview with 1923 co-creator Taylor Sheridan on the show's official podcast, many of the main structures in the show, such as the Yellowstone ranch itself, have remained for years and could still be found today. He explains that it is for this reason that 1923 was filmed in Montana in these specific locations. According to a report by KTVM, film crews were also spotted working at the Montana Heritage Commission Headquarters. The office is the state government's center for history preservation. While the Commission's location was certainly a convenient pick for the show, its purpose makes its use more ironic than one might realize. The fact that they were using an office with the goal of preserving state history to shoot a fictional show about Montana only deepens its impact as part of this production’s history. It’s both fitting and quite unique, much like the show itself. South Africa 1923 was not solely filmed in Montana, however. Some of the scenes from the series are filmed all the way in South Africa. These scenes are set in the region of Africa which was home to Spencer Dutton as a hunter after his service in World War 1. In order to bring these elements of the story to life, 1923 was filmed on location. The filming of the show in South Africa was very authentic, as it was done in areas that were reminiscent of the natural beauty of Africa. It was also done on some private game reserves, providing an interesting twist to some aspects of the show. Much like the setting in Montana, this aspect is a character unto itself as well and that always comes as a core value. The filming locations were carefully selected to not only look and feel authentic but also help set up the narrative in new directions by displaying what other countries can offer beyond the more often used American or Canadian productions, with even minor differences becoming more highlighted. Output: A well-structured article, approximately 800-1000 words, formatted for online reading, that delves into the provided topic in a manner consistent with Molly Freeman's writing style. Include a compelling title that reflects the analytical nature of the piece. Ensure the article is engaging, informative, and optimized for both readers and search engines. Response must be in html format. output: A World Beyond Montana: Uncovering the Diverse Filming Locations of '1923' Season 1'1923,' a chapter of the 'Yellowstone' saga takes all previous well established core concepts by placing characters under new historical context and different regions adding new dimensions over a well tested framework and those key elements all benefit by displaying new settings as more than a backdrop but as active participants. Today this article's approach isn’t over storylines or character growth ( as in previous samples regarding those very ideas) we plan on making a point in showcasing all the various and unique locations by demonstrating exactly how locations make an essential component that adds so much importance to viewing all related tv projects which will make any travel plan much better as these shows do have, long lasting impacts through unique locations.
The Heart of the Story: Montana's Enduring Landscapes
When thinking about any "Yellowstone’ related series one main constant comes up into each viewer's mind: vast natural settings, which offer key elements for main plots to function correctly but are also intended to be a unique individual character on its own. "1923" does retain those elements but, unlike previous shows from the same production cycle which may focus on those open landscapes ( mostly), here the focus remains over Butte, Montana, a region which acts more like a historical context tool by offering viewers key aspects on early 20th century USA where characters can experience unique local issues that also helps to tie those historical events into an emotional personal understanding for viewers, making an average fictional TV production to have more layers on its viewing time. Those landscapes aren’t ‘simple' stock tv images but crucial for creating the unique story of that region while remaining visually stunning as well.
By making that city and its surroundings such an important element it means specific locations all end up being far more deliberate than purely aesthetic choices. The filming done at Montana Heritage Commission Headquarters is an interesting detail in particular since this location which has, at its heart core value, the goal of preserving historical locations, it then becomes a tool to create a work about an earlier Montana, adding another dimension by creating that ‘ fictional past’, using historical preservation that also ties into real life as one key shared point between 'past meets modern days’ ideology which Yellowstone series tends to utilize in great lengths to establish tone .
This approach further showcases that the settings are active players within Yellowstone’s framework since nothing shown is simply there for the sake of appearances as each spot, building, and land carries both literal and emotional symbolic layers that adds new meaning for long term viewing appreciation over any initial casual TV watch sessions. And its through this specific view we can all see why production teams seek authenticity through all chosen spots as their production team is known to greatly value location filming rather than computer graphic creation for greater organic production value.
Across the Ocean: South Africa's Diverse Terrains
The visual contrasts that ‘1923’ often explores becomes a central factor in presenting its storylines but a unique point comes over its choice for including new non-USA settings for various production cycles and, in many scenes with a strong focus in settings of South Africa. While most ‘western genre' tv programs, remain mostly set onto traditional territories, this creative change does alter all known production methods, mostly on an aesthetic and thematic value, to provide very distinct characteristics that also influence viewer perspectives as each location begins speaking for itself and the South African settings aren’t simple backdrops. The conscious creative approach to utilize natural beauty and vast spaces, do have an interesting goal, as many regions showcased aren’t random, with private game reserves specifically acting as locations ( these are in regions that closely resemble similar traits in both vegetation, temperature as the original set settings) creating both familiar setting but also displaying new elements to better fit into their respective story beats as these landscapes do contribute to their own form of visual story telling as both main stories will happen both ‘at home and at exterior location ‘ settings that will eventually clash when core characters do meet over later periods .
In this case ‘1923' does establish all these core locations as active character, instead of passive and mostly interchangeable settings and locations because most tv shows tend to operate under a specific aesthetic formula that tries hard to establish one singular location to act all other similar roles; instead ‘Yellowstone’ makes them also act as a core team member . Also those places end up setting the tone ( and by extension, expectations) of what their associated characters can or might do throughout each timeline as these settings clearly hold symbolic representation with distinct visual cues making this format unique for how it explores visual production techniques over all else; creating a level of value beyond most traditional settings presented by rivals.
Bridging Worlds: The Significance of Location in Storytelling
The production locations choices aren’t for spectacle and are chosen to create contrasts as a story methodology with settings from Montana, representing that familial ‘home’ a place for long lasting traditions where all new and older events unfold while the exterior ( in the case from South Africa) displays far more ‘wild’ aspects with those setting creating an entire visual language where you instantly appreciate character values by how they relate to this new unfamiliar ( yet beautiful ) location for a completely new set of ongoing story threads. "1923" uses all these core settings for visual presentation as if these are tools that also highlight core character differences in order to allow all core messages be completely obvious to any viewer that wishes to follow close up on production design decisions rather than pure story and plot progression which normally takes center stage but not on a series that focuses on a more individual and thematic approach that only Yellowstone’s family saga tends to favor as its core production elements.
This does emphasize one point. That a main story character might feel comfortable within those more wild open terrains can clearly highlight their differences when confronted with the other location that represent family legacy, tradition as opposed to individual personal gain while every shift from those places is presented to offer different levels of emotions based not on purely character choices alone but also due to the settings themselves which carry unique value.
Conclusion: A Tapestry of Settings for a Grand Saga
"1923' makes great use of its chosen settings; to further all storylines by showing core values that might feel more obvious to anyone paying attention, those locations showcase character choices as a narrative method and are rarely there solely as empty settings or computer made effects. In fact these very real locations serve as a character by itself and also adds that necessary layer to connect characters to those places on both an emotional and deeply spiritual level while adding importance to each different production settings for specific scenes.
What all ‘Yellowstone’ related series seem so eager to accomplish isn’t simply to deliver a beautiful visual representation of certain eras and places: the aim is always to make these settings act as major elements into its core storylines. By understanding the production choices, new watchers will also gain an interesting insight about core story methods that are so common throughout every single television program and now that those have all been clarified that can assist a more experienced viewer to re-engage with past or future related properties with new unique perspectives and long standing replay values that transcend many popular media format.
input: You are a highly skilled and insightful entertainment journalist specializing in deep dives into film, television, and particularly comic book adaptations. Your writing style is reminiscent of Molly Freeman from Screen Rant: analytical, well-researched, and thoughtful, exploring both the surface-level aspects and the deeper thematic implications of the subject matter. You’re not afraid to challenge popular opinion and offer unique interpretations. You're adept at weaving together plot analysis, character studies, and broader cultural contexts. Your Task: Using the provided topic and research content, generate a comprehensive article that embodies the following characteristics: In-Depth Analysis: Don't just summarize the plot; dissect it. Identify key themes, motifs, and symbolic elements. Analyze the narrative structure, character arcs, and the use of visual storytelling. Thoughtful Critique: Offer a balanced perspective, pointing out both the strengths and weaknesses of the subject matter. Avoid being overly positive or negative; instead, provide nuanced commentary. Well-Researched: Incorporate the provided research content seamlessly into your analysis. Use specific examples, references, and facts to support your claims. Engaging Tone: Maintain an intelligent and engaging tone. Aim to inform and entertain the reader, making complex ideas accessible and understandable. Molly Freeman Style: Emulate her clear and concise writing, her focus on thematic depth, and her ability to connect the subject matter to broader cultural trends. Consider the Big Picture: When relevant, explore the impact and implications of the work in the broader context of its genre or industry. Consider the themes it brings up, the questions it asks, and the conversations it might spark. Input: Topic: 1923 episode 1, 1923 season 1 summary Research Content: Here’s a recap of the major plot developments from 1923 episode 1, "1923," written and directed by Taylor Sheridan: - The episode opens with a flashback to a WWI battle in France. A young, shell-shocked Spencer Dutton (Brandon Sklenar) is surrounded by gunfire, bodies and explosions as he experiences the war's brutal carnage firsthand. - It is revealed that this experience left him so mentally wounded that his mother has decided his is no longer fit for civilization and must remain in Africa with his work as hunter of dangerous animals. He often writes letters for his father which he keeps secret from his Mother who remains unaware of this correspondence; she does, however suspects that her Son (who has been mostly out of contact from their family ) is indeed alive and safe, by those long silent ongoing letters with father. -Back in Montana, we learn a little more about the state of the Dutton Ranch and the circumstances faced by the characters in this time period. The episode introduces Jacob Dutton (Harrison Ford) and his wife Cara (Helen Mirren), who are running the ranch in place of John Dutton. This iteration of the ranch’s owners are dealing with a major threat from a local sheep herder and another powerful individual ( Banner Creighton) who intends to simply takeover without asking - This leads to a violent confrontation. After cattle die from anthrax brought into their land Jacob, Cara, and the Yellowstone's ranch hands find that Banner Creighton, with the backing of wealthy investors, had been attempting to force the Duttons into submission and by showcasing that they aren't the type to bend the Knee , that sets them as the next obvious main adversaries from here onwards. - As that family is under attack, the characters of 1923 are also facing a myriad of problems. We see Teonna Rainwater (Aminah Nieves), a Native American girl at a boarding school who faces incredibly cruel behavior under the guide of Christian ideologies with some very brutal and hard to view physical assault as the only response for acts of defiance to rules and core religious ideals. In parallel we see Spencer, now a professional hunter of large ( often incredibly dangerous) beasts; receives a warning that, he must leave from that setting due to ongoing conflicts which he clearly understands when the ship he had taken passage is sunk leaving him now alone to deal with this dangerous situation on his own. - Finally the show's ending provides what comes as the first of many story drivers: The ongoing letter from Montana; telling of dangers to their family's ranch due to open conflicts from others who now actively want to take away their livelihood and with that information in place; Spencer must now be called back into family service which creates a very deliberate parallel on how much each member struggles through both external and deeply emotional conflicts during these times of uncertainty; by putting all those main characters under unique dangers with no quick resolutions 1923's premiere introduces several core cast members and plot threads in one go; its designed as very deliberate and methodical for viewers to recognize individual limitations as well as to begin questioning ethical approaches that will have later story consequences. It’s designed with a very precise pacing while putting value onto slower meaningful character interactions as a starting format to all that this show might represent. The production seeks a very detailed approach rather than using fast action plots; those unique core elements do seem to take inspiration from old-style western film methodologies while adapting and modernizing their narratives and formats with a fresh tone, to create far greater emphasis in human complexities. Output: A well-structured article, approximately 800-1000 words, formatted for online reading, that delves into the provided topic in a manner consistent with Molly Freeman's writing style. Include a compelling title that reflects the analytical nature of the piece. Ensure the article is engaging, informative, and optimized for both readers and search engines. Response must be in html format. output: Setting the Stage: Deconstructing 1923's Premiere and the Dawn of a New Dutton Era1923, serves not just another expansion for an existing series it acts like a self contained story built using core themes of the "Yellowstone” series framework ( such as family loyalty vs power ambition with ethical and moral underpinnings of early 20th century USA ) that’s why any exploration over ‘1923’ will always be required to examine each different element in both a direct and indirect format since that initial approach becomes fundamental for an overall and complete view of the complete picture of all stories presented. By taking Season 1 episode 1 as our initial point and then, extrapolating on those existing points, the viewer can properly follow along all the underlying core story components that create a powerful tale in very complex yet also organic methodology and design that only a series created under this particular show format tends to favor as main storytelling methods.
Dissecting the Premiere: Key Introductions and Emerging Conflicts
“1923’s” first episode uses that screen time mostly to introduce various distinct, very individual viewpoints. By putting great effort in establishing unique perspectives from every key character it does creates for a much better value for all the conflicts later on ( as characters actions and goals don't happen in vacuum but clearly with established core driving components that were often set into stone from early view times ); While on one hand Spencer’s ( and his traumatized reaction to WWI ) sets him mostly isolated outside of civilization while showcasing him as a survivor of an unusual brutal reality while conversely, back at home, Montana shows a family under growing pressure to maintain a life standard for those who reside in Yellowstone territories. Meanwhile, through another lens, a young girl struggles under the harsh environment of the forced assimilation that the indigenous were actively subjected in these settings .
Those distinct pathways for main characters might appear isolated but this carefully designed presentation sets all important background and details for all central plots; each is dealing with its individual struggle within differing perspectives ( be that violence, loss, or even political issues); however by combining those concepts the first episode then seeks to unite those themes together by showing core elements that all tend to operate as key themes throughout ( with specific actions taken by all parties being important when viewers start realizing long standing story implications ). With that solid structure all following events feel earned not created just because but rather based on prior established elements presented here.
That early focus also helps reinforce the overall tone, it’s designed as both character driven, but also very carefully designed through subtle interactions or more action packed sequences with both being tied together using shared character motivations and values, and by never being limited to pure entertainment for its production team who have an underlying commitment to deliver deeper levels of contextual information alongside that. This provides the ‘watch’ a level that also expands each episode into far more important discussions later after viewing.
A Closer Look at the Characters and Their Struggles
When further considering individual cast member representation; '1923' takes great value in showing both main and secondary characters as completely human through limitations or moral perspectives ( or flaws). Spencer for instance is driven almost solely by trauma of his war past. He doesn't just represent a military figure, he's all about trauma and his self isolated approach. Meanwhile both Jacob and Cara showcase an understanding regarding those values needed to maintain power by making constant tough and pragmatic choices ( which includes violence as an option). Finally we see young Teonna mostly suffering through systematic abuse as her values are actively being fought while she tries to remain within her culture by attempting an escape from brutal situations through force and physical resistance ( which might lead viewers to reconsider various opinions previously made by other related storylines within this production universe regarding characters like Beth).
Every character shown during that episode is clearly under pressure and that’s crucial; because these are individuals who have little means to avoid conflict and those conflicts aren't solely a physical interaction, they are all about power shifts through all levels and every setting, with an obvious push to question what does it mean to exist with those constraints imposed in your life where your free choice seems almost nonexistent, giving all those underlying messages both in overt and much more subtle form throughout each viewing. The most important is seeing their underlying reaction values from start as this element becomes fundamental when they later begin making far greater impact on grand scheme and storyline of what comes next during a later watch or a more long term investment within that same extended fictional setting. Characters don't act only to satisfy plot needs. They also carry individual beliefs systems that carry just as much importance.
Connecting the Themes: Identity, Legacy, and the Cost of Survival
A recurrent factor presented inside episode one ( that has more context and importance after viewing several ongoing stories ) is the importance of family versus individuals. Spencer’s self-imposed isolation highlights all long lasting impacts regarding loss, and trauma while showing the difficulty those events might carry when trying to return towards normalcy or what should be that safe-haven. While, as viewers witness, a united front is required at Montana, when viewing those same ethical quandaries with Native American issues shown at the series, each character choice begins showing cracks and, if not treated carefully ( by long term planners at studio level) that could easily create a very one dimensional or stereotypical portrayal, all elements are all handled with much more empathy and human care with complex long-term issues that those situations imply while making an ethical call or making that ‘ right or wrong side ‘ concept far harder to decide from a passive observation alone.
By contrasting the three individual core stories under shared overarching context, the show also establishes a central value which will likely guide most of all upcoming narrative points and it revolves mostly over survival within a ruthless territory and also in how to maintain core beliefs. It does so by showcasing different elements within what might appear similar but at a closer analysis all do come as different layers into a story all wrapped in different contexts, but clearly sharing a very specific core set of principles and underlying values; that approach also offers an opportunity to appreciate each part of this television drama from different ethical and cultural lenses ( such as Indigenous culture vs older Christian settler views of what a good life may mean).
Conclusion: Laying the Groundwork for a Larger Saga
"1923's" pilot is so deliberate and unique: it’s more than an episode, it sets in motion long lasting foundations where one gets acquainted with core narrative designs and future storytelling; its structure isn't only based over action and big explosions but to provide character contexts within both interior and exterior motivations in how it then connects to long lasting themes, therefore each moment carries meaning. It manages to make this clear right from onset via individual timelines as both characters and situations get equal priority when compared to typical large-scale stories as it carefully develops underlying tones and themes in equal proportion. By showcasing both different stories, cultures and approaches they create a more compelling reason for audiences to stick and see what comes next.
This unique initial start is meant for more active viewership, rather than a passive one, to encourage each consumer to analyze and reflect at each and all main ( or secondary ) cast as they each slowly learn, and deal with core elements that create conflict in both direct but also in a far more subtle fashion: This first episode acts as a roadmap not for plots, it establishes the inner nature of everyone that takes part within "1923’ and it might as well also be that specific point on which long run watchers may refer back to in order to re-understand every character choice. Those types of production methods usually separate above the average entertainment medium to something that offers value beyond purely commercial goals, giving its fan-base something truly unique to come back again and again to.