Sylvester Stallone's Armor: Will He Finally Die on Screen?

Sylvester Stallone's Armor: Can This thriller Finally Break a Decades-Long Trend?

Stallone's Action Legacy: A 46-Year-Long "No Death" Rule

Sylvester Stallone. The name alone evokes images of those epic action movies, and intense action sequences; not to mention the intense physical demands for those movie roles which have impacted how much respect he’s received across his extremely prolific career; yet most people only see his success through specific movie series! Rocky made him a star. Then Rambo. Action movies became his trademark and a staple he remains closely associated with even after decades passed. His prolific output, and lasting success created an entire genre focused on action heroes, especially around the mid-80s when audiences sought increasingly intense plots with extremely memorable heroes that resonated with many different demographics across ages.

But Stallone's had a weird habit: his heroes almost never die! That’s been going on for nearly 46 years since his debut 1978 film F.I.S.T. This almost unheard of moment involving Stallone was only recently made public; resulting in some surprise reactions. Will Armor finally break this?

Also Read: The popularity of Hit Man reminds Netflix's viewers of their Assassin Movie for 2023.

Armor: A Villainous Role and a Potential Death Scene for Stallone?

Armor Sylvester Stallone standing on bridge with men with guns behind him Image

The trailer for Armor is awesome. It’s got Stallone leading a heist crew; those high-stakes armored car robberies always deliver action, intensity and memorable suspense. It features that kind of tension-fueled scene only action movies might achieve so effectively and is exactly the reason why people love watching Stallone’s movies.

Yet this role seems different! This is Stallone’s first villain role in 21 years (since Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over). If his character, Rook, doesn't have some last-minute redemption, he actually dies! That would totally smash Stallone's no-death rule, making this one completely unique movie!

Also Read: Why, despite a 35% audience score, this new shark thriller rules Netflix worldwide?

Why Stallone Doesn't Kill Off His Heroes (and Why He Might Want To!)

Sylvester Stallone from the Sly Documentary in Front of the Rocky Statue Image

Stallone’s belief about sad endings got recently aired out through a Netflix documentary—Sly— explaining that unhappy endings don't typically resonate well; he emphasizes in that film he specifically hated the original ending to First Blood where Rambo died (because it gave him serious anxiety and even anger for similar reasons)! Test audiences even hated it; resulting in Rambo miraculously surviving after that initially grim demise that could've otherwise ruined those films entirely. That no-death rule affected numerous films– Get Carter's remake got rewritten.

Yet that same principle has hampered those things he’s previously done. Rambo’s Last Blood ending, for example originally included a tragic, realistically gritty demise, that would otherwise make sense and should’ve otherwise succeeded at impacting people significantly, is instead softened—showing that this no-death habit even has drawbacks!

Also Read: Ken Sato is whoever? Explained by Netflix's New Ultraman

Armor: A Chance for Stallone to Embrace the Dark Side (And Possibly Meet His End!)

fist-movie-sylvester-stallone-no-death-bad-habit Image

That unique and ambitious choice to get Stallone into a full-fledged villain role and potentially letting him die at the very ending is extremely bold. It might break Stallone’s signature action movie formula.

Armor’s relatively small-scale budget doesn't impact the production of what we are given: this seems to fully allow Stallone’s talents to take the spotlight as intended rather than using smaller parts only to please certain demographics, making that promised appearance for these roles a much-needed thing for audiences who might've just missed out on Stallone’s previous work! The ending might showcase his ability to portray true villains! Even his Rambo gets incredibly dark! If this Armor does make use of a realistic, possibly fatal ending, this alone makes it instantly significant to Stallone’s ever-evolving action career.

Also Read: Mike Flanagan's New "Exorcist" Movie Update: A Release Following His Netflix Run.

Conclusion: Will Armor Be Stallone's Masterpiece?

Sylvester Stallone Armor standing on a bridge holding a gun Image

Armor has an excellent chance to stand out; it's simple enough yet exciting enough! Stallone’s involvement is big. If Rook dies; a true shocking ending! It remains to be seen what Armor holds. This could redefine Stallone's action image. It remains to be seen whether Stallone breaks his 46-year-long no-death tradition for a grittier finale. The very possibilities involved is already extremely noteworthy!