Why Are There So Many Bad Sequels to War Movies?
Many war movie sequels tend to fall flat, even for The Best war movies - The series may continue to exist because it provides those opportunities to expand the existing fanbase, but more often than not those sequels fail to create a strong or, more importantly, engaging story which captures the hearts of audiences, a reason why they don't receive critical acclaim. Even if War Movie Sequels often focus on the heart of the action film, as well as those important elements of a Film, many are still quick to forget those original story arcs and the power that The Best War Movies were able to deliver.
Many movie franchises struggle to maintain the same level of interest or viewership - it can also make a big impact on those box office success that are seeking to expand their IP. Recognizable War Movie IP that may have worked well with a Movie can sometimes feel very different - when those original storylines that may have worked for one iteration of a Film can be harder to bring to life as those ideas for future iterations of the movie fail to maintain the same intrigue, even when they are seeking to bring more realism into a Sequel, particularly as audiences might want to see something very different.
What Are Some Of The Worst War Movie Sequels?
For those seeking a new film, it's important to do your homework and ensure you choose those movies that capture the same intrigue of Classic Militaristic Films.
Many War Movie Sequels fall into the trap of Direct-to-Video Sequels - and if you are looking for something a bit more substantial and impactful, you may want to seek those original productions out - Many Film that might come to mind when thinking about War Movies - might still provide you with an amazing storyline even though a sequel was made.
Does Jarhead Have Bad Sequels?
Fans of Jake Gyllenhaal and Jarhead were excited when the War Movie was released. Jarhead , starring Jake Gyllenhaal, is considered one of the actor's top movies and the War Movie that set the stage for his acting career to be re-imagined.
However, those fans may be quick to realize that this series also has one of the most disappointing sequel runs - especially after being introduced to the "Jarhead" universe. "Jarhead 2: Field of Fire" (The first "Jarhead" sequel), although having its moments, unfortunately went down a very different path. Fans have often remarked that they did not like this new direction or that those storylines in "Jarhead 2: Field of Fire" didn't have the same strength as its predecessor film - it often tried to maintain a more realistic tone - and despite its lackluster presentation - it's a War Movie that continues to exist.
Did the Jarhead Sequel Continue To Get Worse?
Unfortunately, those fans seeking out a strong or, dare we say, a "great" production of "Jarhead 3: The Siege," which serves as the latest installment of the franchise. "Jarhead 3: The Siege" may have taken "Jarhead" to a different place by moving into another realm within this universe - it was still unable to garner the same high level of engagement. The film was a disappointment - a direct-to-video Sequel to the franchise that really had no strong historical accuracy , even as it was loosely based on a real-life story that often serves as the main thread for most "Jarhead" story arcs, it may have helped, but fans felt like it did not help with how the movie was received.
Even as "Jarhead 3: The Siege" received poor reception - it often shows the common theme - particularly about how to balance a realistic interpretation of war - which might be the biggest challenge to capture in this "Jarhead" series. However, the film was successful and received decent ratings. Fans often gravitate towards "Jarhead" - the first movie was "Jake Gyllenhaal's" top film and one that showed how he could create powerful Film characters, a testament to this actor. Even so, with this type of War Movie you can often see the difficulty in translating a successful first installment of a franchise into a Sequel.
How Does The Behind Enemy Lines Series Rate?
For those looking to enjoy "Behind Enemy Lines," a movie that was inspired by the real-life Mrkonjić Grad incident - Those interested in understanding the conflict in "Behind Enemy Lines," it's crucial to realize the history of the Military that helped inspire it - but the series was successful and continues to maintain popularity amongst audiences.
Many Film that seek to create a fictional representation of real events often take the risk that the film may struggle to make a strong impression. Behind Enemy Lines did struggle when it came to those later productions, and it ultimately was a difficult choice to continue making "Behind Enemy Lines" series, in part, because they went off track from its source of inspiration. Fans will recognize the "Behind Enemy Lines II: Axis of Evil," which veered into an almost unbelievable fictional territory that didn't quite fit within its universe or the Historical Accuracy that often gave audiences the ability to relate, but unfortunately those Film didn't offer the same. Even with "Behind Enemy Lines: Colombia," that attempted to bring those same storylines from the first production into a completely new era with another story arc, but those ideas were unable to capture the same critical success or audience. This may have also made it challenging for the filmmakers to find ways to take on those new storylines. Many critics have said that these storylines may have worked best as a mini series but, in turn, may not be the right choice. In the "Behind Enemy Lines: SEAL Team 8," we see how this production did seek to return to that more grounded representation, which garnered the ability to relate. Even though these "Behind Enemy Lines" series, were unable to replicate the success of the original production - they still received favorable ratings.
Is 300: Rise Of An Empire A Bad Sequel?
Those who have seen "300" (a classic and "Zack Snyder Film," a show which captured audiences with its over-the-top fight sequences) may feel like "300: Rise Of An Empire", despite showcasing incredible talent, such as the "Second Persian Invasion," might have failed to bring that same energy to its story. It has even been recognized that the show often relies too much on the "Battle of Marathon" and was only able to produce a weak imitation of its original. The show unfortunately veered away from those iconic elements and, for many audiences, it was harder to relate. The film might have also made the mistake of not incorporating the original story that many fans loved - the film, in turn, may not have achieved the success of the original "300", which set the stage for the franchise and its legacy. Even though fans didn't get another "Zack Snyder Film" that had that same intensity, it did get the attention it deserved. This film serves as a popular production in its own right - but it doesn't do anything particularly exceptional to make it stand out. The "Meet the Spartans," for those who enjoy parody - this film was a spoof movie which, though lighthearted - served as an amazing source of entertainment that is highly recognized and received well, making it one of the more popular Movie in the market today.
It was a big surprise to many when "300: Rise Of An Empire" (as a production which served as a follow up to "300" was released, especially when fans were seeking to see the same depth and intensity from the series. However, the film, while showing off a stunning and visually stunning approach to action, as well as those important themes related to history and the battles fought, also made those efforts to expand and bring back those classic War Movies storylines.
Does Rambo III Fail to Meet The Expectations Of its First Two Movies?
When those fans seek out "Rambo: first blood Part II," a "Rambo" film which really took "First Blood" (the initial installment of the franchise and one that is still considered to be a Classic Movie, especially by fans who revere it as a top choice, and one of the series' best Film - for its storyline. "Rambo" is considered to be the series that set the foundation for a massive franchise, "Rambo III". Many Film lovers are fans of "Rambo: First Blood Part II" - and for those looking to see that same intensity of the original - they were met with a different direction. Those interested in War Movie Sequels should note that the "Rambo III" series may have taken those classic themes from "Rambo" (that emphasized the horrors of war, specifically related to the "vietnam war" - in particular the traumas of soldiers), but unfortunately those were unable to be transferred to its sequel, and they couldn't reach that same level of intrigue. In many instances - the series went too far in showcasing the violence and those action sequences and as a result it wasn't able to maintain those elements from the original production - the series' focus and dedication to those more gruesome and extreme war sequences, might have been too much to bear, resulting in it being over-the-top. While the film garnered some "Box Office Success," it still left many fans feeling let down.
For those fans seeking out a more diverse and compelling movie there's always a chance - but the Rambo series - may have made the mistake of trying to make something very different than those previous series - a big change and shift in tone which brought audiences to those initial productions, one which involved those more classic "War Movies" . Many fans might have felt that the "Soviet" invasion of "Afghanistan," (which often features those intense battles) - this production - made an unsuccessful attempt to bring in a different "Military" concept, that many fans did not appreciate.
Is Braveheart's Sequel Robert The Bruce Bad?
Many fans will acknowledge "Braveheart," a highly anticipated Movie that also showcases the talents of Mel Gibson - which continues to be one of his top rated and Classic Films that attracted audiences, specifically those interested in those historical movies - which explored Real-Life Conflicts. "Braveheart" was a critical and "Box Office Success" and one that introduced those important themes regarding history. Many would be eager to see if there was an official Sequel, but, luckily for fans of the original - those who were expecting another "War Movie Sequel" - "Robert The Bruce" is more of a lesser-known movie that, while "Mel Gibson" produced it - might have also failed to deliver.
Although there were numerous elements that might have helped to keep "Robert The Bruce" aligned with "Braveheart," there are some major differences that would have made it difficult for the filmmakers. In many ways the movie lacks those same intense and exciting moments that audiences loved about "Braveheart," particularly for its story arcs. It didn't make sense to keep the same story arcs from "Braveheart", particularly for a series that focused on the Scottish war for freedom, but for those who were anticipating a more dramatic, introspective look at those themes that drove "Braveheart" (which captured audiences with those moments where they felt empowered by the main character, William Wallace - and saw the potential for those stories to emerge), this was the wrong production. Even though those key ingredients may not have been present, the movie still received high praise.
Is Under Siege's Sequel Worth Watching?
"Under Siege" (which featured those big star appearances and has a loyal and dedicated audience for those fans who enjoyed watching "Steven Seagal", who plays Casey Ryback). Fans might not realize that this movie was a "Classic" and "die hard" - a movie that sought to find an interesting take on the "Action" genre and often showcases those moments of high intensity. The production's overall appeal has also driven audiences towards "Under Siege 2: Dark Territory." Even so - there were mixed reviews. Those who watched the original, might feel that this particular movie didn't really take on those themes, but the series still serves as a top choice for fans who are eager to discover that "Die Hard" inspired movie. The film received critical acclaim and remains an entertaining choice that might just be a must-watch.
Those interested in a "War Movie" might be quick to see those similarities in tone, storyline and that it may just resemble "The Dirty Dozen" in a very bizarre and unlikely combination. It might make sense for those seeking to explore those key storylines and elements that are reminiscent of the "Dirty Dozen," and a series which was considered to be "Classic Militaristic Films," and those who enjoyed watching those. There are numerous elements that will definitely appeal to "War Movie" lovers, and for those who might seek to explore a film filled with "Action," but the film unfortunately made the mistake of losing that historical context.
Are The Delta Force Sequels Bad?
Those fans who were excited about "The Delta Force" ( a series starring Chuck Norris). The first film, "The Delta Force," was highly-received and became one of "Chuck Norris's" best films. Those who love to watch "War Movies" often look to "The Delta Force" series as a must-see. For those looking for that "Action" packed movie.
While "The Delta Force" received an incredible amount of attention from the audience, and remains a popular choice, those interested in exploring the other productions within the series will find several problems: "Delta Force 2: The Colombian Connection" failed to capture those themes from the first installment of the series. The sequel tried to do too much in capturing the essence of the original, and that led it to make some major mishaps. The movie may have been able to deliver in terms of action - but unfortunately those elements were missing and there were numerous disappointments in this movie. Similarly - with "Delta Force 3: The Killing Game" - the franchise sought to bring in a new character - "Mike Norris" (who often appears in other "Chuck Norris's" films, as well as several TV shows. While the production didn't generate much in terms of ratings - the "Delta Force" series remains a great source of entertainment that fans still talk about.
