Movies News Talk
While many fans would be excited to see those stories from the movie industry continued, it seems as if those in hollywood movies are constantly looking for ways to continue or expand upon stories that were popular in the past - but this isn't always the right approach for a story, in fact, a large number of those who are in love with film can tell you that some films should have ended. The main reason why this happens? It's about profits - as those who produce these film sequels are looking for more box office success and have often created several franchises - a strategy that often ensures studios have an assortment of content. But these can often become "overproduced."
However, the main issue - a common concern that can often come up as a discussion across the film industry and even amongst movie industry critics. Some question whether or not these productions (in essence: a return of those iconic characters - a continuation of a narrative - that had a popular, iconic element) will give those same fans the same experience.
The drive to make money can be quite influential and, as a result, it's unavoidable to witness some "money-driven" movie franchises appear across a range of film genres. These productions can have a strong sense of originality and entertainment. However, this is not always the case for film sequels - with some franchises having the potential to continue the main characters while offering a fresh perspective. However, those in Hollywood have also often tried to "milk" their creations to get the most out of their storylines and production, which has often caused those who love films to express concern, even disappointment.
These decisions often fall to studios that aim to expand a film franchise with several titles to make as much money as possible, even if they have a questionable idea or plan. This results in unnecessary sequels - those movies with terrible sequels and the overall decline of a once popular storyline or theme, all of which ultimately can become the source of a vast assortment of critical articles and debates about what constitutes a good film and which sequels are the worst movie sequels.
There's always an exception - a series of those film franchises that have managed to find the perfect mix between a compelling story and those characters that were loved, all while staying true to those early installments - delivering film sequels that meet the demand of a vast, diverse audience.
The more common outcome is a situation that often leads to more "stale" storylines - where those in Hollywood continue to try and create a compelling movie sequel that offers an even greater depth or entertainment, however, it's a formula that seems unsuccessful more often than not. As those familiar with those productions that are not well received: It appears that studios and producers seem to often be stuck in their creative vision - seeking to use the same elements that made the first release so popular. They end up not only replicating, but ultimately "diluting" that initial energy.
It's a constant question as film lovers often want to see those movie franchises expand upon some of their favorites. But there are some cases where studios seem to "force" those franchises into continuing to expand when the original film (its essence) was considered perfect - a standalone narrative - and a standalone Hollywood movie that stands apart, an example could be a film such as “Casablanca,” a timeless story.
The main issue here comes down to those producers, who are looking to create more profit with a new story arc, a potential expansion into another market ( such as creating additional sequels, television adaptations, or a movie sequel that aims to expand upon a concept. For those who are interested in "film history," there’s always the danger that these studios end up “spoiling" what is known as a great film. These attempts at generating even more content and money through those sequels, ultimately make a production look unoriginal - something that ultimately can disappoint those fans.
There has been ongoing debate within the film world regarding the impact of those bad movie sequels that often ruin or ruin those film franchises which have a history of being remarkable successes.
Those in the film industry often look for ways to ensure that their film sequels can reach those expectations, even to try to exceed them. It seems as if there's no simple solution, but those in this industry (including studios) continue to be confronted by these criticisms as fans continue to question the value and potential success of "more". In many ways, it's an important discussion - as we are reminded that sometimes it is important to let stories die and those that end at their prime. The ultimate goal should be to leave audiences with an element of mystery, to make them long for a film sequel that never gets to happen and is left to the imaginations of fans, often providing greater meaning, depth and wonder than anything a bad sequel could bring.
There's a massive collection of movies and franchises that, sadly, do have examples of those sequels that often miss the mark. There are some very popular franchises, however, that come to mind and have been frequently mentioned across those in the film world. For example: "The Matrix" franchise (including the sequel that was highly disappointing to many critics). And even those bad movie sequels that feature iconic action heroes - such as “Terminator” series and how “Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines” is frequently ranked among those terrible productions, which may have even ruined those that are otherwise quite beloved - as if there was an attempt to ruin an otherwise iconic film.
The movie industry is not always perfect. It seems as if a lot of producers are constantly looking for new and creative ideas for film sequels that will expand on those movie franchises. Sadly, it appears that many have gone off track, delivering a slew of disappointing titles, leading many fans to express concerns.